Hence I wrote
If it means they are forcing shit like Shira Law. No it isn't British. You can practice any heritage or religion for all I care, hence why were free to do so. But if that "heritage" means rape, kill, be-headings, paedophilia. You damn right I'm not going to support it. Clearly you seem to do.
After how long has he converted people to fight for ISIS and the alike? He's indirectly murdering people and creating killers and should be trailed as such. 6 years (with will be half as usual) for murders. While free speech is always needed, he is using the said freedom to force and demand people to be restricted of said freedoms (even though he smoked weed and drank). Just open your eyes to the things he was saying everywhere, it doesn't take a genius to see alarm bells and to start investigating him and watching his actions. But no he gets a small sentence for being allegiance to an enemy of the state many years later after he's converted god knows how many whether through trickery, lie, deception, will or forced.
Why does this not apply to the asylum seeker? What if it was just a bunch of lowlife chavs out to cause shit and thought the boy was an easy target to rob or whatever? Only because the victim was foreign, it immediately known as a hate crime. People get mobbed everyday and beaten up, people do it over football for fuck sake.
I'm paraphrasing you...
See how it sounds now? No one should be scared to walk the streets, that is certain. The kid can get back to his daily schedule one day and hopefully have a speedy and well recovery. The chavs got their charges and convictions and people move on. It'll always be traumatic for the boy but he can eventually be strong and continue studying etc.
Meanwhile the 9 families of the victims on St Petersberg cannot continue on. They can cannot get back what they had the day before over time. People are gone. Dead. Can't come back. No healing.
Facts > Feelings I'm afraid. I'm stating the double standards you're trying to pull. You're all for declaring the chavs a hate crime because victim was another colour yet same goes for the attacker to the victims on Westminster. But labels right?
How on earth do you know if it is a hate crime otherwise? As I said, the victim could have been any colour and been attacked. The victim could have been doing something? I've yet to read how they knew he was a foreigner asylum seeker. Because if you're all for this too be a hate crime then surely same must apply to Westminster.
They talk about connecting and a few buzzwords of motivation holding hands freedom liberty, chuck in. Never actually doing anything. Calls the attacker Islamic but calls the attack not Islamic = Political Correctness. What a joke.
As I said I go by facts. I know people lost their lives unnecessarily and things need to change. I know that a person got mobbed and they were brought to justice.
Running around pretending things aren't real doesn't help I'm afraid.