Right, that was just a discussion, replies going back and forth(e):P. But then during that discussion, i made this statement:
To which you replied with the proposition of a $1000 bet
So, by logic, ofcourse the bet refers to MY statement, which you said you could prove wrong, so much so that you proposed a bet.
There are no stipulations afterwards, it is just right there, in my statement.
Just seems to me you are trying to use semantics to back down from your own bet, and saving face.
Again, it's fine if you don't wanna make the bet, but then don't propose it in the first place as some tough guy