What the hell are you talking about? Some trophies mention the targets, none of them are someone vital. And if you say they are hidden: the same thing happened with Hitman 2 on 2018 and no one is hidden. Alma Reynald, Rico Delgado, Andrea Martinez, The Maelstrom and Janus are all names in the trophy list I recognized mentioned in Hitman 2016. Now in Hitman 3 only Yates I recognized and none of the vital characters are targets.
That’s why I dissapointed. Now I just want the 20th to come quick to get it over with and get rid of my anxiety.
that’s the dumbest excuse ever. you know who’s also working with the most secretive organisation in the entire world? 47 and Diana! lots of characters have been established either way
How is that a dumb excuse? @Q.Minh has said that some of the targets haven’t been in brought up in any level before and the reason why is they are ICA operatives. No normal people know about them and Providence cared so little about the ICA they ignored them.
I just think it’s incredibly dumb how people thing that nobody important will die because a trophy doesn’t name them…the final mission only has 5 mastery levels…that is a scripted level with not many options for opportunities which means you wouldn’t have a trophy telling you to kill a person in x, y, and z manner and they sure as hell wouldn’t spoil if the Constant, 47, Diana, or Lucas would die in a bloody trophy description.
Possible I guess, I recommend just waiting for the game. I am of the opinion that just because a person is brought up doesn’t mean they should have a mission. Bringing in people mentioned in the game and making them targets makes the world feel kind of small to me.
Funny considering last time before Hitman 2 was released I recognized the names in Hawke’s Bay, Santa Fortuna, Mumbai and Whittleton Creek in the trophy list . The Knoxes I didn’t know but I knew about Kronstandt.
My guess is he is the Romania “target”. I think reaching him in his fancy car is the end goal of the Carpathians. I remember a fan season that ended with Grey being one of the targets and I made a remark about 47 dressing up like a clown and bludgeoning grey with a fish in the middle of International Court of Law.
I feel like IO want to give Edwards or whoever the big baddie a more dignified death since the story builds towards this as a climax. it makes sense since, regardless of my opinion, IO feels proud of their story and I think they reserve the right to end the last target on their terms. Strictly from my opinion of course.
That being said there is nothing to say that we can’t use what we do know to reverse engineer the story. We don’t see Hall as a target (unless she uses an alias) so we assume Grey doesn’t betray us, we don’t see Diana on there so we don’t kill her at the very least and so on.
it worked just fine in the first four(contracts never really had a villain but still) games to kill the big bad guys yourself and nobody liked the way they did that in absolution, so i hope they’ve learned their lessons. hitman is a comedy game as much as anything else
It is a reference to Hackers. The targets work for an ICA Data Collection Facility and Hall isn’t ICA if she wasn’t the ICA would have had an easier time finding her. Plus we know one of the targets is male.
Since we are hacking the ICA or working with computers wouldn’t that prove we are working with Grey and Hall since she is using her expertise to help 47 hack the ICA?
. The Knoxes I didn’t know but I knew about Kronstandt.