The time to cater to deniers is over we must act now it is imperative. Also the word was chosen by scientific consensus not me. That is a thing I want to change, I am no scientist but I understand science and I understand scientists. The problem with them is that scientist cannot communicate effectively as they think
Yes, but while action being taken is certainly appreciated, bombing isn’t very discrete, so, naturally, civilians died (about thirty, maybe more). But the big damage was to infrastructure. And like any good bombing run, there was a sequel…
Have you heard of Dresden? The effectiveness of bombing has been established since then. I’m not defending bombing, but explaining it as a war tactic.
It takes a lot of lives. Obama’s executive branch has taken many more lives than Trump’s (albeit O’s got five years longer), as much as it pains me to say, and that is because of drone airstrikes. Which is modern day aerial bombing.
You oughta play Civ, I think you’d like it. Do not do this around exams.
Perhaps you know all this, and neglected to mention it.
The fact is: bombing, or airstrikes, or any kind of air warfare is a symptom of war. And clearly, the part of the nature of this strategy is civilian casualties.
This is why I don’t go for explosion kills in Hitman.
…#.BACK TO TOPIC.#…
War never changes. It evolves. I won’t defend Obama, but this practice is not unprecedented nor is it limited to leaders publicly deemed as good.