On a serious note though, judging by the fact that Jiao didn’t just dump them there at 47’s mercy, they are probably not getting disposed of just yet - after all it’s not exactly their fault 47 is so good at his job. It doesn’t matter that much as 47 leaks ICA’s data into the wild shortly after, so even if they do get fired or hunted, same happens to all other ICA (ex) employees.
Probably a combination of getting arrested, getting killed themselves by rivals and enemies, forced into hiding until the heat dies down, and perhaps some executed by ICA management at the hands of other agents before 47 shut it all down, or even after. It’s strongly hinted that failure isn’t really an acceptable outcome for a mission, and even though it is 47, they still did send twelve agents, all of them equipped with all the available info on him and knowing exactly who to look for and what to expect. Ignoring the fact that 47 is just so good at discreet killing that it borders on the supernatural, ICA management probably still held them accountable for failure, assuming any survived the encounter at all. Jiao at least was likely in for a stern “reprimand.”
Throughout the trilogy there are many instances of places where if you’re up against a wall you get a prompt to change cover which will make 47 swap over to the other side. Is there any point to this ability? Is there any place in a mission where it’s advantageous to do this instead of just manually running across a gap? In all my hours spent in the trilogy I’ve never really used it.
I do it regularly! In my head, it feels “safer” to use that Change Cover mechanic to cross a gap where an enforcer might be watching. I have no idea if it’s actually safer or not, but to me, it is.
Same for me, I think the time you are visible is shorter than a manual transversal between two covers. You can also not accidentially mess it up by getting stuck.
I do it simply bc it’s less buttons to press. I’m less worried about getting stuck on my current side and more worried about not being able to get into cover on the new side.
Good question. I guess for me it has always been Two-Face, there is a sense of pathos with his character that I think has always been really mature for a Batman villain and as an OCD sufferer I identify with some of Dent’s struggles. Plus his origin story and rise to power is central one of the best Batman stories,Dark Victory
Yeah good Choice, Harvey is always pretty cool, even the Tommy Lee Jones version has its moments.
My favorites are Clayface and HARDAC both from the animated Series. I’m not sure HARDAC had any other appearances but man I’d love to see those two in modern Batman Movies.
Which one? I always like Karlo, he is probably up there as well for me in terms of villains.
HARDAC itself has never been in the comics as I am aware but the basic premise of HARDAC has been used a few times in Batman especially Brother Eye and the version of OMNIC in the New 52
I know there are multiple Clayfaces but i only know Karlo from Arkham City and Matt Hagen from the animated Series, so i go with Matt because we see more of his actual character. Karlo is just the twist and “final” boss iirc.
I love Hagens Clayface design and i remember having nightmares as a Kid after seeing this transformation scene on TV for the first time
Rigt now I’m watching “Heart of Ice”, the btas version of Mr Freeze is also bad ass. Also my favorite Freeze Design
Two-Face from The Long Halloween and The Animated Series are my favorite versions of the character. I guess you could say that it’s a flip of the coin which I like best of the two