Cha-ching, motherfucker!
5 Likes
That… is awesome news.
6 Likes
Don’t mean to make light of what’s happening, but after reading that article title, I think they’re plagiarizing @Accidental_Kills98.
And I don’t buy the “accident” explanation.
2 Likes
What do you even mean by not buying the accident explanation? There have been incidents in which the idf accidently shot at each other and it is sad every time.
When I read about this accident I just felt weak for a bit and incredibly sad.
Israel has shown a consistent lack of care about its hostages throughout this ordeal, because it cuts into their narrative of why they continue to attack Gaza. The claim that these three were killed by accident, considering how many falsehoods have surrounded this whole situation already, makes me question the claim.
Statements are not a lie in every case just because of other questionable decisions.
Don’t use the death of the hostages as an argument for your narrative that is unrelated to this event.
You can of course doubt it, but don’t construct a proof out it. It sounds completely unbelievable to negligently or even intentionally kill hostages you are meant to bring back alive.
3 Likes
This entire war has 2 objectives:
- Rescue the hostages.
- Eliminate Hamas.
The IDF does not attack Gaza for fun and games, there is a purpose, and believe me, as a person on one side of the war that truly wants it to end, war is awful, no one enjoys it, hopefully both objectives will be met.
(And as Urben requested, let’s leave this topic as it is, as there are people that this war is VERY personal to, like me)
1 Like
I didn’t say they are a lie, I said I question them. I make no claim that what they said happened wasn’t true, or offer up an alternative of what I think happened or why, because I don’t know, I only state that I don’t buy the explanation as given.
He didn’t though? He didn’t buy the explanation and questioned the claim. No facts as far as I see.
That must not stop one from criticizing actions from the Israeli side (and god there is quite a lot to be said)
I’m not talking about Heisenberg’s recent posts, just in general.
2 Likes
Yes I see I am mistaken here, sorry.
What I want to point out though, is that “accidential” is roughly the same as “unintentional”. That has only one alternative: intentional. So if you say you don’t believe it to be an accident, you semantically say you believe the killings to be intentional. And that is something I want to read either with believable sources or not at all.
4 Likes
Venezuela and Guyana agree that force should not be used in Essequibo dispute
5 Likes
There it is.
I don’t buy the accident explanation.
It identified participating nations, led by the United States, to include, among others, the United Kingdom, Bahrain, Canada, France, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Seychelles and Spain.
So much for all the people announcing/predicting a global disengagement of the US, and a disinterest in protecting international trades.
2 Likes
Byyyyyye 
3 Likes
And to think, he could have been big for years to come if he’d simply controlled his reactions when angered, or at least taken responsibility for his actions immediately after committing them. Its amazing how many people ruin their prospects so easily, all because of their egos (I say without a hint of irony to my online handle).
Colorado’s not going to let Trump on their primary ballot because they’re all sensitive about that whole insurrection thing. 
“A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision.
5 Likes
Meanwhile Sean Rose finds his way onto the ballot in Colorado.
1 Like
If they want a president who has no qualms bombing children then they can just vote for Obama for a third time.
3 Likes
To be fair… oh, wait, it’s not. Nvm.