so if something doesn’t provide utility, it has no value, right? further, because (logical leap) humans have no discernible purpose/utility since (logical leap) they eventually die, humans have (logical leap) no value and thus anything that provides utility to us doesn’t have value.
That’s it, exactly. To clarify, I am perfectly willing to admit that this is simply a perspective, so I could very well be wrong in all of this. I know that; you can’t have a rational mind and not keep that in your back pocket. I just haven’t been convinced otherwise to be able to see another perspective for nearly two decades.
Oh yeah. People I work with say that I tire them, and I’m like, “You?!” I then point at my head, “You haven’t had to listen to this, every waking moment, non-stop, for the last (however old I am while saying this) years! This never shuts up. You only have to hear me when I decide to talk.”
Wait, Birth of the Hitman was a piece of shit from the beginning, except for that cover artwork that was vaguely based on the Codename 47 promo render with 47 and this gargoyle-thingy
I’d say A as i dont think i could live with milk (does that count?) everyday of my life as im lactose intolerant soooo, i do however enjoy it every now and again.
To put it short I’d spend the rest of my life on the toilet or bankrupt paying for dairy free milk
Perhaps they are distinguishing between helmets made to protect someone from a crash, and helmets meant to protect someone from a bullet in combat? Only reason I can think of.
That was what I assume too but it’s auto racing. The drivers all wear the same kind of helmet.
It would be like if the NFL announcers kept saying “football helmet” during the game. The players are all wearing the same kind. You can just say helmet.
Maybe it’s trademarked and they have to say it for rights reasons? Straws being grasped at this point. It’s probably just the usual fucked up eay of speaking that nobody thinks about.
No way there are actually 3 companies that make the things and one super complicated situation where one driver is signed as a sponsor from company 1 but their team aerodynamasist likes the way the other companies helmet works better so he wears a mis labeled helmet. Kinda like if you wore Nike shoes made by Reebok.
It’s just part of the way they speak the language, but I’m curious if it’s unique to F1 or if a Brit on the street might say bicycle helmet or construction helmet instead of just helmet.